The Weekly Leading Index (WLI) of the Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) to one decimal place is unchanged from last week. It is now at 129.7, the same as last week’s downward revision from 129.8. See the WLI chart in the Appendix below. The WLI annualized growth indicator (WLIg) has risen fractionally to 6.6%, up from last week’s 6.3% (a downward revision from 6.4%).
Those of us who regularly follow ECRI’s publicly available data and commentaries understand that there is no logical connection between ECRI’s proprietary indicators and their “pronounced, pervasive and persistent” recession call of September 2011.
Last year ECRI switched focus to their version of theBig Four Economic Indicators that I routinely track. But when those failed last summer to “roll over” collectively (as ECRI claimed was happening), the company published a news grab bag of indicators to support their recession call, which is still featured on their website.
See also Lakshman Achuthan’s most recent interviews on Bloomberg, CNBC and Yahoo’s Daily Ticker. Click the links to view the videos.
Essentially Achuthan is sticking to his opinion that a recession began in mid-2012, although he now calls it a “mild” recession, which is quite a shift from his original stance 18 months ago: “…if you think this is a bad economy, you haven’t seen anything yet.”
ECRI posts its proprietary indicators on a one-week delayed basis to the general public, but last year the company switched its focus to a version of the Big Four Economic Indicators I’ve been tracking for the past several months. See, for example, this November 29th Bloomberg video that ECRI continues to feature on its website — twelve weeks later — along with the now clearly false assertion that “Indicators used to determine official U.S. recession dates have been falling since mid-year.” Achuthan pinpoints July as the business cycle peak, thus putting us well into the eighth month of a recession.
The most recent public news event from ECRI was the CBS Moneywatch March 18th commentary, Can the stock market rise while the economy stalls? ECRI liked the commentary well enough to reprint it on the company’s website. It basically reiterates Achuthan’s point in the “Yo-Yo Years” essay that it’s possible for the market to rise during a recession, citing three such instances (of the 15 recessions) since the Roaring Twenties:
- Thirteen months during the Roaring Twenties when the Dow rose 13.8%
- Eight months during the wartime economy of 1945, when the Dow rose 17.1%
- Six months in 1980, when the S&P 500 rose 8%
As of yesterday the S&P 500 hit a new all-time high and is up 34.5% since their initial recession call and 15.2% since the “recession” began.
Here is a chart of ECRI’s data that particularly undermines the company’s recession call — the smoothed year-over-year percent change since 2000 of their proprietary weekly leading index. I’ve highlighted the 2011 date of ECRI’s recession call and the hypothetical July business cycle peak, which the company claims was the start of a recession.
A salient feature in the “Yo-Yo Years” report is the use of year-over-year variants for selective indicators, for example, this tight close-up of employment:
These charts look quite disturbing. But let’s take a longer look back at the left chart in the two-pack above. Here is the year-over-year of the monthly Nonfarm Employment data back to 1940. ECRI’s close-up of the last six months, with a cropped vertical axis from 1.1% to 1.9%, is a microscopic view of a few bacteria in a Petri dish — not persuasive evidence that a recession started last July.
If you click on the chart above for a larger version, you’ll see links above the chart that will take you to the YoY equivalents for the other indicators, including the Manufacturing and Trade Sales variant the ECRI has previously preferred for its sales data.
The data series I personally find the most concerning as a recession harbinger is Real Personal Income Less Transfer Payments. But as I’ve pointed out elsewhere, the latest YoY data for this series is skewed by the 2012 year-end tax strategy. The February data, released today shows a move toward normalization, but the latest YoY data point is lower than the onset of all recessions since this series has been available.
However, as I pointed out in today’s Big Four update, there were three comparable YoY dips that weren’t associated with recessions: The two tax-strategy events in the 1990s and the YoY math of the Microsoft one-time dividend in 2004. Needless to say, we’ll want to see this indicator show continued growth in the coming months.
Ultimately my opinion remains unchanged from my position in recent weeks: The ECRI’s posture at present is best understood as an effort to salvage credibility in hopes that major revisions to the key economic indicators — notably the July annual revisions to GDP — will validate their position.
ECRI’s Recession Call Was a Bet Against the Fed
Let’s briefly review the history of the ECRI recession call. ECRI adamantly denied that the sharp decline of their indicators in 2010 marked the beginning of a recession. But in 2011, when their proprietary indicators were at levels higher than 2010, they made their controversial recession call with stunning confidence bordering on arrogance:
|Early last week [September 21, 2011], ECRI notified clients that the U.S. economy is indeed tipping into a new recession. And there’s nothing that policy makers can do to head it off….Here’s what ECRI’s recession call really says: if you think this is a bad economy, you haven’t seen anything yet. And that has profound implications for both Main Street and Wall Street. (source)
Ironically enough, on the same day ECRI forecast a recession, Chairman Bernanke announced a new policy, Operation Twist, which was followed by QE3 in September 2012 and unlimited easing (aka QE4) in December 2012.
Essentially ECRI claim that “there’s nothing that policy makers can do to head it [a recession] off” was a bet against the Fed.
For a few months after ECRI’s recession call, their proprietary indicators cooperated with their forecast, but that has not been the case since the second half of 2012 — hence their switch to the traditional Big Four recession indicators. Now that those are less cooperative, ECRI is cherry picking other indicators and switching to year-over-year perspectives when the monthly trend isn’t sloping downward.
My Personal View…
The Fiscal Cliff is behind us, but the 2% FICA increase is apparently weighing on consumer sentiment, as the latest Michigan data suggests. The underlying trend in core personal income, if you exclude the tax-planning blip, is showing slight deterioration. On the other hand, today’s Industrial Production data looked good, and Real Retail Sales announced this week surprised to the upside. ECRI’s preferred metric for sales, the lagging Real Manufacturing and Trade Sales data (updated two weeks ago, data through December), was strong in November and December. Here is a snapshot of ECRI’s version of the Big Four Economic Indicators.
Despite my rejection of ECRI’s call that a recession began in mid-2012, I do think the US economy remains vulnerable. The greatest endogenous threat is the ongoing impact of the expired 2% FICA tax holiday, disappointing Personal Income and the real impact of sequestration, which has scarcely begun. Previously acknowledged exogenous risks are reemerging in eurozone recessions and the political stalemate in Italy may be copycatted elsewhere in the eurozone periphery.
The Second Estimate for Q4 GDP at 0.1 percent bears watching. Of course, the third Estimate could adjust it higher. But earlier hope that an improved trade balance would boost the Second Estimate didn’t pan out.
The Usual Caveat: The recent economic data are subject to revision, so we must view these numbers accordingly.
Appendix: A Closer Look at the ECRI Index
Despite the apparent increasing irrelevance of the ECRI indicators, let’s check them out. The first chart below shows the history of the Weekly Leading Index and highlights its current level.
For a better understanding of the relationship of the WLI level to recessions, the next chart shows the data series in terms of the percent off the previous peak. In other words, a new weekly high registers at 100%, with subsequent declines plotted accordingly.
As the chart above illustrates, only once has a recession occurred without the index level achieving a new high — the two recessions, commonly referred to as a “double-dip,” in the early 1980s. Our current level is 11.9% off the most recent high, which was set over five years ago in June 2007. We’re now tied with the previously longest stretch between highs, which was from February 1973 to April 1978. But the index level rose steadily from the trough at the end of the 1973-1975 recession to reach its new high in 1978. The pattern in ECRI’s indictor is quite different, and this has no doubt been a key factor in their business cycle analysis.
The WLIg Metric
The best known of ECRI’s indexes is their growth calculation on the WLI. For a close look at this index in recent months, here’s a snapshot of the data since 2000.
Now let’s step back and examine the complete series available to the public, which dates from 1967. ECRI’s WLIg metric has had a respectable record for forecasting recessions and rebounds therefrom. The next chart shows the correlation between the WLI, GDP and recessions.
The History of ECRI’s Latest Recession Call
ECRI’s weekly leading index has become a major focus and source of controversy ever since September 30th of last year, when ECRI publicly announced that the U.S. is tipping into a recession, a call the Institute had announced to its private clients on September 21st. Here is an excerpt from the announcement:
|Early last week, ECRI notified clients that the U.S. economy is indeed tipping into a new recession. And there’s nothing that policy makers can do to head it off.ECRI’s recession call isn’t based on just one or two leading indexes, but on dozens of specialized leading indexes, including the U.S. Long Leading Index, which was the first to turn down — before the Arab Spring and Japanese earthquake — to be followed by downturns in the Weekly Leading Index and other shorter-leading indexes. In fact, the most reliable forward-looking indicators are now collectively behaving as they did on the cusp of full-blown recessions, not “soft landings.” (Read the report here.)
Year-over-Year Growth in the WLI
Triggered by another ECRI commentary, Why Our Recession Call Stands, I now include a snapshot of the year-over-year growth of the WLI rather than ECRI’s previously favored method of calculating the WLIg series from the underlying WLI (see the endnote below). Specifically the chart immediately below is the year-over-year change in the 4-week moving average of the WLI. The red dots highlight the YoY value for the month when recessions began.
The WLI YoY, is off its interim highs at the latest reading of 3.6%. However, this is higher than at the onset of all but one recession in the chart timeframe. The second half of the early 1980s double dip, which was to some extent an engineered recession to break the back of inflation, is a conspicuous outlier in this series, starting with a WLI YoY at 4.1%.
Additional Sources for Recession Forecasts
Dwaine van Vuuren, CEO of RecessionAlert.com, and his collaborators, including Georg Vrba and Franz Lischka, have developed a powerful recession forecasting methodology that shows promise of making forecasts with fewer false positives, which I take to include excessively long lead times, such as ECRI’s September 2011 recession call.
Here is today’s update of Georg Vrba’s analysis, which is explained in more detail in this article.
Earlier Video Chronology of ECRI’s Recession Call
- September 30, 2011: Recession Is “Inescapable” (link)
- September 30, 2011: Tipping into a New Recession (link)
- February 24, 2012: GDP Data Signals U.S. Recession (link)
- May 9, 2012: Renewed U.S. Recession Call (link)
- July 10, 2012: “We’re in Recession Already” (link)
- September 13, 2012: “U.S. Economy Is in a Recession” (link)
Note: How to Calculate the Growth series from the Weekly Leading Index
ECRI’s weekly Excel spreadsheet includes the WLI and the Growth series, but the latter is a series of values without the underlying calculations. After a collaborative effort by Franz Lischka, Georg Vrba, Dwaine van Vuuren and Kishor Bhatia to model the calculation, Georg discovered the actual formula in a 1999 article published by Anirvan Banerji, the Chief Research Officer at ECRI: The three Ps: simple tools for monitoring economic cycles – pronounced, pervasive and persistent economic indicators.
Here is the formula:
“MA1” = 4 week moving average of the WLI
“MA2” = moving average of MA1 over the preceding 52 weeks
WLIg = [m*(MA1/MA2)^n] – m
Images: Flickr (licence attribution)
About The Author
My original dshort.com website was launched in February 2005 using a domain name based on my real name, Doug Short. I’m a formerly retired first wave boomer with a Ph.D. in English from Duke. Now my website has been acquired byAdvisor Perspectives, where I have been appointed the Vice President of Research.
My first career was a faculty position at North Carolina State University, where I achieved the rank of Full Professor in 1983. During the early ’80s I got hooked on academic uses of microcomputers for research and instruction. In 1983, I co-directed the Sixth International Conference on Computers and the Humanities. An IBM executive who attended the conference made me a job offer I couldn’t refuse.
Thus began my new career as a Higher Education Consultant for IBM — an ambassador for Information Technology to major universities around the country. After 12 years with Big Blue, I grew tired of the constant travel and left for a series of IT management positions in the Research Triangle area of North Carolina. I concluded my IT career managing the group responsible for email and research databases at GlaxoSmithKline until my retirement in 2006.
Contrary to what many visitors assume based on my last name, I’m not a bearish short seller. It’s true that some of my content has been a bit pessimistic in recent years. But I believe this is a result of economic realities and not a personal bias. For the record, my efforts to educate others about bear markets date from November 2007, as this Motley Fool